Penalties impact a roller derby bout tremendously. Ask any jammer who has been called off for a major track cut on the last jam of the game when points matter.
The most obvious impact to the game: Jammer penalties. An opposing team can wreck havoc if your jammer is in the box, as they are able to manage multiple scoring passes. Likewise, if you're team is on a power jam, you want to maximize the score.
Whole offense and defense strategies have formed revolving around that sole idea.
Penalties range from as small as a minor (slightly affecting gameplay) to major (a massive gameplay advantage) to Misconduct and Gross Misconduct, which I won't go into but are similar to a super-group of penalties.
A skater can accumulate up to four minor penalties before being directed to the penalty box. (Currently, WFTDA is experimenting with a no-minor system and only time will tell if minors are completely wiped from the game entirely.)
Four minors equals a trip to the box. One major equals a trip to the box. Any skater with three minors, must essentially think of her next minor as being the same as a major, since it has the same effect. Acquiring your fourth minor sends you to the box, just as a major will do the same.
Again, our friends who wear the star covers serve as our example. A really clean-skating jammer with 1 or 2 minors, generally can make it through a jam without picking up her fourth minor, particularly if she has lead (which I'll bring up again later.)
And unless she's a super-clean skater, any jammer with 3 minors shouldn't jam except in the rarest of ocassions (as such if her team has a very explicit game plan, i.e. if she picks up her fourth we do X).
When a skater who usually jams has incurred her third minor, her team will set her up to intentionally acquire her fourth minor as a non-pivot blocker (or sometimes when she is the pivot). This is something you can control, as opposed to send her out there and she unintentionally picks up her fourth. This is sometimes referred to as poodling (a submissive term) or cougaring (intentionally picking up a minor).
Once her minors are wiped away, the skater can again jam again.
Instead of intentionally acquiring the minor, you can put the skater in the pack in the hopes that she'd pick up a minor. The downside being that if she gets called for a major (1 minute of penalty time, and she still has 3 minors), or in the process of picking up her fourth minor she also is awarded a major (2 minutes of penalty time, no minors). Obviously both are horrible situations to put a potential jammer into, so it's more beneficial to set them up to earn the minor intentionally (plus, it's something you have control over versus something you don't).
The most common penalties for jammers are Cutting (passing a skater while out of bounds) and Backblocking (making contact with an illegal target zone - the back).
Cutting penalties will often occur in and around the turns, and usually on the inside of the track. This is because of a player's momentum and physics pulling her on the track. A player on the inside of the track has a much shorter path than those on the track or toward the outside.
It's very easy for a player to step off the track (to the inside), travel a short distance and accidentally re-enter the track ahead of one skater (generally a minor) or more skaters (a major, which is also called if the player Cuts the foremost, in-play blocker).
On the outside, Cuts generally are incurred because after being hit out of bounds, a skater steps back on the track ahead of a player that was beside her. Color does not have any bearing on the Cut, as the definition is player, not opposing team member. A red skater would incur the same penalty by cutting a another player no matter which team they play for (red or blue). Two players (indifferent to which team) or the foremost, in-play player becomes a major.
In the course of a game, avoiding these types of penalties remains incredibly important. It's important to practice these scenarios before the game. If you are a jammer who incessantly earns Cut penalties in the course of the bout practice the following:
1.) Watch your feet, when you near the track boundaries: If one foot goes out and you are endanger of cutting, get both feet out of bounds. Numerous cut penalties can happen because a skater drags a foot out of bounds, cuts a player and then brings that foot in-bounds. When you get one foot back in legally, bring both feet in as quickly as possible. (You are not considered back in play until both feet come back on the track, however you may incur skating out of bound penalties and you are legal to hit if you have one foot in play).
2.) Practice one-foot glides near the track boundaries: Try to hold the line as close as possible without putting your free foot (the one in the air) out of bounds. Practice moving your free foot around your body to work on your balance. Practice one-foot glides on both feets (sorry, personal joke) on the inside track boundary, and then on the outside track boundary.
3.) Work on your stops: T-stops, Snowplows, Sucide/Tomahawk stops, Hockey stops, One-foot hockey stops. On the inside it's important to work on the fastest stops possible -- Suicide stops and hockey stops. Since you are moving along a faster path than the in-bound skaters, you must utilize a faster stop. Simply trying to T-stop through a cut won't slow you down fast enough to prevent you from re-entering the track illegally. Likewise, if someone knocked you out of bounds on the outside and they're slowing down trying to force a cut penalty on you (you want to slow down or stop faster than they are so that you can re-enter behind them).
4.) Don't sacrifice your momentum if you don't have to: Just in the way that starting from a dead stop from a fall takes more energy than using your momentum to assist you getting up, so to avoiding a cut penalty by utilizing your momentum is easier than coming to a dead stop. I always encourage our girls to keep your feet moving because it takes more energy to start moving them again, than if they're already moving. Suicide and hockey stops are great for avoiding the cut, but you don't want to actually "stop." You are actually looking to change the direction of your momentum, to get back on the track legally. If the stops elude you right away, instead practice stepping out of bounds and then turning sharply in a tight circle to re-enter slightly behind the spot you exited. If you step out on the inside, you'll turn counter clockwise. If you step out on the outside, you'll turn clockwise. BE AWARE of other skaters and referees in the out-of-bounds areas, as making contact with them can create penalty situations. By turning sharply you avoid accidentally stepping back into play illegally; force yourself to come back into play behind your exit point; and you utilize your momentum by keeping your speed up to pass a slowed/stopped opposing skater.
To avoid Backblocking calls, a skater should learn to control her speed. A jammer who enters the pack at full speed must have a sharper focus and more agility to maneuver through a pack at 100 percent. Also objects in motion tend to stay in motion (Thank you, Isaac Newton), so if a fast moving jammer is hit out of bounds, she'll generally continue moving in that direction. By controlling her speed, a jammer can engage the pack without slamming in the back of an opposing player. Likewise, one of her teammates can eat a backblock from their jammer to check her speed, but I haven't seen that used too effectively to date. The above mentioned stops can be practiced, particularly the snowplow. Even if you practice on a slick floor, try and work on your snowplows and hockey stops, and force yourself to stop at shorter and shorter distances. A good jammer can go from 80 percent to nearly a dead stop in minimal distance. But don't try doing so until you are really comfortable with snowplows, as they can put a tremendous stress on groin and thigh muscles, and ankle strength. Working on lateral movement can also help avoid Backblocking calls, but a skater must move more than her upper body. A potential jammer wants to be able to move her hips to and around other skaters without losing balance (as this will also enable a legal pass on opposing skaters).
Most of these skills will help blockers avoid these penalties as well. My focus on the jammer is because of their direct relation to the score, so it makes for an easy example.
Your jammer avoiding penalties will have an impact on the amount of points they are able to score. You can't score points sitting in the penalty box. Same holds true for the opposing team and their jammer
I constantly see WFTDA jammers letting their team know how many minors she has and the other jammer has. If the opposing jammer has three minors, what is the best course of action?
Do you
a) give her a fist bump for being ballsy?
b) intentionally block your own jammer to give opposing jammer lead, because she's just that awesome?
c) want the opposing jammer to pick up a fourth minor?
If you answered "a" or "b" to that question, you obviously have too much fun just playing derby. If you answered "c," you are correct. It's easier to focus on getting your jammer through the pack if you aren't worrying about the opposing jammer. By getting her to pick up that key fourth minor, she's going to the box. In the course of forcing a fourth minor on her, she picks up a major even better. If she manages to make it out of that jam without incurring any penalty, she will likely try an intentionally pick up her fourth minor later (which will be a minute she's not on the floor or jamming).
By forcing a fourth minor on the opposing jammer, she loses the ability to earn lead jammer, calling the jam if she does earn lead or earn points during her penalty time.
If an opposing player has three minors, it does very little good to hope she magically earns that fourth. You have to actively force her to take that minor.
This can happen by convincing her to take an Illegal procedure penalty (the Jedi mind trick), forcing a Cut or forcing a Backblock. Forcing an opposing player to take a minor penalty is easier than a major, but again the same principle works: A fourth minor has the same impact as a major, i.e. a trip to the box.
To force a major penalty, you will have to get an opponent to commit a pretty big error. If she cuts two or more players, or Backblocks someone hard enough that they completely lose their position or fall down, the opponent will incur a major.
To practice forcing cuts, I usually set players up in pairs in which one player leans/pushes/hits her partner out of bounds, tries to slow down and force the cut. This is good practice for both players in forcing and avoiding the cuts. The next step up is to set players up in trios, in which two skaters pair up to force a cut on the third player -- remember, two skaters is equal to a major.
Practicing Backblocks is a little more dangerous, particularly with newer skaters so it's not something I often condone. You can essentially perform any booty-blocking drills you want, but with the added goal of forcing a Backblocking call. I recommend using your league refs or veteran skaters who know their Backblocking rules. Remember, an opposing skater needs to earn major advantage (position) for the call to warrant a major penalty.
Consider this the first part in what will be a multi-part blog. I'd like to take a blog to focus a little more on managing penalties for blockers, and how important it is to manage penalties from a line coach standpoint.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
Web stats
Thank you to everyone that reads fivepointgrandslam.com.
I actually have a few things in the works, such as a submission to Five on Five magazine. I plan to post some supplemental info here once the article is published.
I am always looking for article ideas. My blog "What's in a Name" has been one of the highest read for me, and I've gotten a lot of positive feedback from it. I'd love to continue finding stories like this and I want to tell the stories of others in the derby community.
I also plan on making it to Eastern and Western regionals, which will be a lot of traveling for me. I'm looking forward to seeing Portland, Oregon, and Baltimore, Mass.
I won't be going to the smaller events this year. Brew-Ha-Ha and RollerCon are a little out of my reach this year, but I really want to see the Coasts this year and I want to make it to Championals this year, too.
You the reader helped fivepointgrandslam.com hit 222 page views in March 2011, which makes it the second highest month for readership. :D
Here's the breakdown per month:
September 2010: 50
October 2010: 190
November 2010: 379
December 2010: 121
January 2011: 98
February 2011: 182
March 2011: 222
April 2011: 80 (incomplete)
Ranking months per hits
379: Nov. 2010
222: March 2011
190: Oct. 2010
182: Feb. 2011
121: Dec. 2010
098: Jan. 2011
080: April 2011
050: Sept. 2010
I actually have a few things in the works, such as a submission to Five on Five magazine. I plan to post some supplemental info here once the article is published.
I am always looking for article ideas. My blog "What's in a Name" has been one of the highest read for me, and I've gotten a lot of positive feedback from it. I'd love to continue finding stories like this and I want to tell the stories of others in the derby community.
I also plan on making it to Eastern and Western regionals, which will be a lot of traveling for me. I'm looking forward to seeing Portland, Oregon, and Baltimore, Mass.
I won't be going to the smaller events this year. Brew-Ha-Ha and RollerCon are a little out of my reach this year, but I really want to see the Coasts this year and I want to make it to Championals this year, too.
You the reader helped fivepointgrandslam.com hit 222 page views in March 2011, which makes it the second highest month for readership. :D
Here's the breakdown per month:
September 2010: 50
October 2010: 190
November 2010: 379
December 2010: 121
January 2011: 98
February 2011: 182
March 2011: 222
April 2011: 80 (incomplete)
Ranking months per hits
379: Nov. 2010
222: March 2011
190: Oct. 2010
182: Feb. 2011
121: Dec. 2010
098: Jan. 2011
080: April 2011
050: Sept. 2010
All about timing - Managing the game clock
The Quad-City Rollers (the league I coach) took on a relatively new team, Midwest Derby Divas, based out of Morrison, Ill. It was the Divas first game and they managed to stay tight and keep the point spread from getting unmanageable (between 20-40 points). If it hadn't been a few key mistakes, the score would have been much closer than the 150-108 final showed.
Setting up for the win
The time remaining on a clock plays a vital role in how a team manages the game. And it's pretty simple:
1.) If you are behind, you want as much clock as you can to pick up crucial point swings.
2.) If you're ahead, you want the clock to keep running and slow the other teams ability to score.
3.) In tied or incredibly close games (zero to 15 points), managing the clock becomes more crucial the more that time ticks down because you essentially must accomplish both 1 and 2.
One mistake yanks the momentum out of your hands.
I also coach my skaters to try and get as much of a point swing as possible. If we score 4 points and they score zero, then that's a 4-0 point swing for us. If we score 4 and they score 4, there is no point swing (a 0-0 wash) and we didn't gain any advantage. However, if they score 4 and we manage a few points (1 or 2) we are able to manage a smaller point swing for our opponents 4 to 1-or-2. Point swings are important whether you are ahead or behind, because it allows you to build a buffer between you and the other team, or it allows you to cut into their lead.
I talk a lot about managing the clock because it falls under one of my key coaching points: We want to focus on the things we can control (getting lead jammer, scoring points, clock control, etc.) and not worry about the things not in our control (ref calls, our jammer in the box, etc.)
A team can control the clock with timeouts, official reviews, timely injury stoppages (not something I condone, but injury stoppages do stop the clock). Players can also manage time with slow starts (crawling across the pivot line), auto starts (taking a new before the pivot whistle), and pack control (limiting time opposing jammer can score while maximizing the time your jammer can score).
I only recommend taking a timeout in the first half if your team absolutely needs a break or if the opposing team is just stomping your players in subsequent jams. Controlling the clock in the second half becomes much easier if you have all three timeouts available to you. If you need a break in the first half and you have something to review, I recommend using your official review as opposed to a timeout because a team is allowed one OR each half.
When you are ahead, let the break clock roll down to five seconds before you call a time out (but make sure you have a line of sight to a ref or the head ref). If you are behind, call a time out as soon as the jam is done (unless the other team or the officials call a timeout (you may have to let some break clock run off so that you give them a chance to do so).
If you are behind: You want game clock
If you are behind: You do not want the other team to have game clock
Since the game clock continues to run even during the 30 second breaks, it plays a vital role in any team's ability to survive.
Another aspect that is sometimes overlooked is the jammer start whistle.
Even if the game clock has stopped because of a review, timeout or stoppage, it will restart upon the pack whistle being blown. However, the jammers are not allowed to skate until after the rearmost pack skater crosses the pivot line.
By blowing the pack whistle, the officials start the 2 minute jam clock and the game clock. A team can eat up both clocks by slow rolling the start or blocking an opposing skater from crossing the pivot line. The slow roll is effective to eat up clock, but also minimize how much time a jammer has to score. One benefit of the slow roll is that since all the clocks restart, penalty time also begins to tick off. The slow roll can give a team a chance to released a penalized player back into play. An auto start (taking a knee before the pack whistle) optimizes how much time your jammer has to score points.
A teaching moment
Toward the end of the game I wanted to call a timeout, but wasn't sure how many timeouts the opposing team had. We had one left and the clock was nearing the last two minutes of the game. If I called the timeout, and even if the jam went the full two minutes, the other team would have an opportunity to call a timeout if they had one.
I bit the bullet and called the timeout at the five second warning. Making sure our girls new the game plan. I laid out the groundwork and got the best girls on the track. I also warned them that they could have to skate a second jam if the opposing team did indeed call a timeout. I also prepped my bench and line bench coach that we could indeed skate another jam.
(If there is any clock left, your team should always be ready to skate another jam, because anything can happen. You should always be prepared, because the one time you aren't ready you will have to skate again.)
Luck (or skill) would be on our side. The Rollers managed to force a major penalty on the Diva jammer, and Sugar N. Slice skated a power jam picking up several five-point scoring passes before the opposing jammer re-entered the pack. With less than 30 seconds left in the game we called jam off. With about six seconds and change left, the opposing team did call a timeout. I turned and looked at one of my skaters, and simply said, "See."
We were ready, and they had to scramble to see who would skate and work out their game plan within the next minute. Whereas, we knew the game plan two minutes ago, prepared to skate a last jam, and could use their 1-minute timeout to go over some finer points.
I coached our jammer, The Taco, to get lead and call it as soon as possible, otherwise keep scoring to dent a possible point swing for the Divas. Taco and Diva jammer, Krystallica, raced through the pack as game time ended (the jam continuing to its natural conclusion). Taco would escape the pack first and earn the lead jammer designation on Turn 3, calling the jam off as she turned Turn 4 and the game was over.
Those last two jams were huge for our team because we controlled key aspects of the game.
Those two jams were set up by lots of little things like managing the clock. Without clock control, the game could have been completely different.
Setting up for the win
The time remaining on a clock plays a vital role in how a team manages the game. And it's pretty simple:
1.) If you are behind, you want as much clock as you can to pick up crucial point swings.
2.) If you're ahead, you want the clock to keep running and slow the other teams ability to score.
3.) In tied or incredibly close games (zero to 15 points), managing the clock becomes more crucial the more that time ticks down because you essentially must accomplish both 1 and 2.
One mistake yanks the momentum out of your hands.
I also coach my skaters to try and get as much of a point swing as possible. If we score 4 points and they score zero, then that's a 4-0 point swing for us. If we score 4 and they score 4, there is no point swing (a 0-0 wash) and we didn't gain any advantage. However, if they score 4 and we manage a few points (1 or 2) we are able to manage a smaller point swing for our opponents 4 to 1-or-2. Point swings are important whether you are ahead or behind, because it allows you to build a buffer between you and the other team, or it allows you to cut into their lead.
I talk a lot about managing the clock because it falls under one of my key coaching points: We want to focus on the things we can control (getting lead jammer, scoring points, clock control, etc.) and not worry about the things not in our control (ref calls, our jammer in the box, etc.)
A team can control the clock with timeouts, official reviews, timely injury stoppages (not something I condone, but injury stoppages do stop the clock). Players can also manage time with slow starts (crawling across the pivot line), auto starts (taking a new before the pivot whistle), and pack control (limiting time opposing jammer can score while maximizing the time your jammer can score).
I only recommend taking a timeout in the first half if your team absolutely needs a break or if the opposing team is just stomping your players in subsequent jams. Controlling the clock in the second half becomes much easier if you have all three timeouts available to you. If you need a break in the first half and you have something to review, I recommend using your official review as opposed to a timeout because a team is allowed one OR each half.
When you are ahead, let the break clock roll down to five seconds before you call a time out (but make sure you have a line of sight to a ref or the head ref). If you are behind, call a time out as soon as the jam is done (unless the other team or the officials call a timeout (you may have to let some break clock run off so that you give them a chance to do so).
If you are behind: You want game clock
If you are behind: You do not want the other team to have game clock
Since the game clock continues to run even during the 30 second breaks, it plays a vital role in any team's ability to survive.
Another aspect that is sometimes overlooked is the jammer start whistle.
Even if the game clock has stopped because of a review, timeout or stoppage, it will restart upon the pack whistle being blown. However, the jammers are not allowed to skate until after the rearmost pack skater crosses the pivot line.
By blowing the pack whistle, the officials start the 2 minute jam clock and the game clock. A team can eat up both clocks by slow rolling the start or blocking an opposing skater from crossing the pivot line. The slow roll is effective to eat up clock, but also minimize how much time a jammer has to score. One benefit of the slow roll is that since all the clocks restart, penalty time also begins to tick off. The slow roll can give a team a chance to released a penalized player back into play. An auto start (taking a knee before the pack whistle) optimizes how much time your jammer has to score points.
A teaching moment
Toward the end of the game I wanted to call a timeout, but wasn't sure how many timeouts the opposing team had. We had one left and the clock was nearing the last two minutes of the game. If I called the timeout, and even if the jam went the full two minutes, the other team would have an opportunity to call a timeout if they had one.
I bit the bullet and called the timeout at the five second warning. Making sure our girls new the game plan. I laid out the groundwork and got the best girls on the track. I also warned them that they could have to skate a second jam if the opposing team did indeed call a timeout. I also prepped my bench and line bench coach that we could indeed skate another jam.
(If there is any clock left, your team should always be ready to skate another jam, because anything can happen. You should always be prepared, because the one time you aren't ready you will have to skate again.)
Luck (or skill) would be on our side. The Rollers managed to force a major penalty on the Diva jammer, and Sugar N. Slice skated a power jam picking up several five-point scoring passes before the opposing jammer re-entered the pack. With less than 30 seconds left in the game we called jam off. With about six seconds and change left, the opposing team did call a timeout. I turned and looked at one of my skaters, and simply said, "See."
We were ready, and they had to scramble to see who would skate and work out their game plan within the next minute. Whereas, we knew the game plan two minutes ago, prepared to skate a last jam, and could use their 1-minute timeout to go over some finer points.
I coached our jammer, The Taco, to get lead and call it as soon as possible, otherwise keep scoring to dent a possible point swing for the Divas. Taco and Diva jammer, Krystallica, raced through the pack as game time ended (the jam continuing to its natural conclusion). Taco would escape the pack first and earn the lead jammer designation on Turn 3, calling the jam off as she turned Turn 4 and the game was over.
Those last two jams were huge for our team because we controlled key aspects of the game.
Those two jams were set up by lots of little things like managing the clock. Without clock control, the game could have been completely different.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Post-Back in Black
The bout against Iowa City's Old Capitol Roller Girls was awesome. I'm constantly in awe of how much professionalism and sportsmanship they have.
We lost 191-83, but considering we into the intermission 107-33, we had a better second half. If we had that kind of output in the first, the final scores would have been closer for sure.
Old Capitol locked on a pretty hardy defense in the first half, and their steady stream of jammers kept pulling away in the early jams. I think Iowa City scored something like 22 points before we were able to get on the board, which took about four or five minutes. That kind of deficit can be pretty intimidating, but the important thing was to never give up.
We never really lost sight of our goal, which was to see how we matched up against Iowa City compared with the last time we met them in October. Since that game, we'd played Eastern Iowa, Rockford and Peoria in pretty solid contests, only losing by 3 points to Rockford in our second matchup with the Ragdolls.
The Iowa City bout was a good test for us as we play Eastern Iowa again on March 26, and then we head up to Madison on April 2.
We lost 191-83, but considering we into the intermission 107-33, we had a better second half. If we had that kind of output in the first, the final scores would have been closer for sure.
Old Capitol locked on a pretty hardy defense in the first half, and their steady stream of jammers kept pulling away in the early jams. I think Iowa City scored something like 22 points before we were able to get on the board, which took about four or five minutes. That kind of deficit can be pretty intimidating, but the important thing was to never give up.
We never really lost sight of our goal, which was to see how we matched up against Iowa City compared with the last time we met them in October. Since that game, we'd played Eastern Iowa, Rockford and Peoria in pretty solid contests, only losing by 3 points to Rockford in our second matchup with the Ragdolls.
The Iowa City bout was a good test for us as we play Eastern Iowa again on March 26, and then we head up to Madison on April 2.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Destroying a slow pack
From Queen of the Rink:
http://www.queenoftherink.com/video-the-proper-way-to-destroy-a-slow-start/
Go ahead and watch the video first.
OK, my response to someone's link on Facebook:
What you have to pay attention is that Black wants a slow pack. They are killing time for their blocker in the box. Black keeps the pack start slow to eat penalty time for their blocker, who then comes in for a big hit. Unfortunately the title is misleading. Black isn't the one that wants to destroy the slow pack. Black wants the slow pack start. What's funny is that White seems completely unaware of it.
OK, now my two cents:
Queen of the Rink has published blogs on how the rules and referees have (negatively?) impacted the sport of roller derby. A proponent for traditional, forward-moving derby, the blog posted this video of someone "Destroying" a slow start.
There are plenty of ways to destroy a slow pack start, but they involve using rules that dictate pack structure, something many people argue is simultaneously ruining derby.
If someone wants to hate on "slow derby" don't use a video that actually promotes the use of "slow derby" to a distinct advantage. In the video, Black clearly wants a slow start to kill penalty time for their blocker who, upon her return to the track, blasts an opposing White player -- which starts the jammers and essentially giving the Black jammer a clear advantage and quick "lead jammer" designation.
I don't always think that "Slow derby" is the best thing in the world, but if a team can utilize both "Slow derby" and "Fast derby," they'll have a greater advantage over a team that only wants to play one way.
We don't practice "slow derby" or "fast derby." We break down pack situations and how we can control them. Sometimes it's via a slow pack speed and sometimes it's through a fast pack speed, but understanding both helps us utilize and hopefully hinder each.
(NOTE: I don't hate Queen of the Rink. I actually like it. The blog usually has pretty solid arguments for its opinions. This one just struck me as odd because the title is slightly misleading.)
(And maybe I'll put together a list of characteristics of slow derby and fast derby. Hmmm, blog idea?)
http://www.queenoftherink.com/video-the-proper-way-to-destroy-a-slow-start/
Go ahead and watch the video first.
OK, my response to someone's link on Facebook:
What you have to pay attention is that Black wants a slow pack. They are killing time for their blocker in the box. Black keeps the pack start slow to eat penalty time for their blocker, who then comes in for a big hit. Unfortunately the title is misleading. Black isn't the one that wants to destroy the slow pack. Black wants the slow pack start. What's funny is that White seems completely unaware of it.
OK, now my two cents:
Queen of the Rink has published blogs on how the rules and referees have (negatively?) impacted the sport of roller derby. A proponent for traditional, forward-moving derby, the blog posted this video of someone "Destroying" a slow start.
There are plenty of ways to destroy a slow pack start, but they involve using rules that dictate pack structure, something many people argue is simultaneously ruining derby.
If someone wants to hate on "slow derby" don't use a video that actually promotes the use of "slow derby" to a distinct advantage. In the video, Black clearly wants a slow start to kill penalty time for their blocker who, upon her return to the track, blasts an opposing White player -- which starts the jammers and essentially giving the Black jammer a clear advantage and quick "lead jammer" designation.
I don't always think that "Slow derby" is the best thing in the world, but if a team can utilize both "Slow derby" and "Fast derby," they'll have a greater advantage over a team that only wants to play one way.
We don't practice "slow derby" or "fast derby." We break down pack situations and how we can control them. Sometimes it's via a slow pack speed and sometimes it's through a fast pack speed, but understanding both helps us utilize and hopefully hinder each.
(NOTE: I don't hate Queen of the Rink. I actually like it. The blog usually has pretty solid arguments for its opinions. This one just struck me as odd because the title is slightly misleading.)
(And maybe I'll put together a list of characteristics of slow derby and fast derby. Hmmm, blog idea?)
'shit skaters dont tell you'
From Randi Maehym:
"This snow angel shit in the middle of the track has got to stop."
http://randimaehym.blogspot.com/2011/03/road-to-awesomeness-shit-skaters-dont.html?spref=fb
*****
My aside and why coaching and working with new(er) skaters is so important
I always look for perspectives from new to intermediate skaters because after being in derby for three years you tend to take certain things for granted. It's usually only after we see a new skater make a mistake that we say "didn't anyone ever teach you ..."
The blank stare is your obvious clue that no one did, in fact, teach this poor girl how to: fall small, don't push up from the ground with your fingers, always look around you, keep your feet moving, exhale before you take/give a big hit, hold the inside, watch for their jammer, watch for your jammer, communicate ... breathe. ;)
We also take for granted that there is so much to learn in derby when you're new that it's hard to remember everything.
Vets have the same tendency to take things for granted. Coaching is a great way for us to remember the little things that are just as important as complex strategy.
If you are a new(er) skater and you truly have a passion to learn the sport, start talking to people. Talk to the coaching/training staff or find a buddy who has been skating for awhile. These people are invaluable to you becoming better.
Now ... this is not to say that if you try to cozy up to a veteran skater you won't get rebuffed. Vets can be a little gruff with newer skaters because, honestly, we've seen so many women walk out the same door they came in without much of an effort. Many women (and men) will come into your practice thinking it will be easy (and for about 5-10 percent it might be) only to give up after being frustrated or upset that "Skater X doesn't like me."
Derby isn't a popularity contest (or, it shouldn't be). Those of us that are in this sport and have been in it for some time aren't in this to make new friends. We have a compound goal of becoming better and, eventually, getting a few wins out of it.
If you are a new skater and you do try to get friendly with a vet, don't take it personal if she doesn't automatically free up her schedule to meet you for tea and cake.
Continue to prove yourself by dedicating your time and energy to a thing that she loves and she will likely come around. And if she doesn't, there's always the skater next to her.
(NOTE: For a while, we were using a buddy system of Bigs and Littles. We had so many new girls come in at once that it was nearly impossible to help all of them at once. By pairing them up with a vet on the team it was easier to disseminate information to them. Not all vets participated. We're not all warm and fuzzy. But you could see a distinct improvement between vet-newbie relations.)
"This snow angel shit in the middle of the track has got to stop."
http://randimaehym.blogspot.com/2011/03/road-to-awesomeness-shit-skaters-dont.html?spref=fb
*****
My aside and why coaching and working with new(er) skaters is so important
I always look for perspectives from new to intermediate skaters because after being in derby for three years you tend to take certain things for granted. It's usually only after we see a new skater make a mistake that we say "didn't anyone ever teach you ..."
The blank stare is your obvious clue that no one did, in fact, teach this poor girl how to: fall small, don't push up from the ground with your fingers, always look around you, keep your feet moving, exhale before you take/give a big hit, hold the inside, watch for their jammer, watch for your jammer, communicate ... breathe. ;)
We also take for granted that there is so much to learn in derby when you're new that it's hard to remember everything.
Vets have the same tendency to take things for granted. Coaching is a great way for us to remember the little things that are just as important as complex strategy.
If you are a new(er) skater and you truly have a passion to learn the sport, start talking to people. Talk to the coaching/training staff or find a buddy who has been skating for awhile. These people are invaluable to you becoming better.
Now ... this is not to say that if you try to cozy up to a veteran skater you won't get rebuffed. Vets can be a little gruff with newer skaters because, honestly, we've seen so many women walk out the same door they came in without much of an effort. Many women (and men) will come into your practice thinking it will be easy (and for about 5-10 percent it might be) only to give up after being frustrated or upset that "Skater X doesn't like me."
Derby isn't a popularity contest (or, it shouldn't be). Those of us that are in this sport and have been in it for some time aren't in this to make new friends. We have a compound goal of becoming better and, eventually, getting a few wins out of it.
If you are a new skater and you do try to get friendly with a vet, don't take it personal if she doesn't automatically free up her schedule to meet you for tea and cake.
We will try and help you when we can, but it's hard to invest in a person when you have know idea whether she'll quit next week.
Continue to prove yourself by dedicating your time and energy to a thing that she loves and she will likely come around. And if she doesn't, there's always the skater next to her.
(NOTE: For a while, we were using a buddy system of Bigs and Littles. We had so many new girls come in at once that it was nearly impossible to help all of them at once. By pairing them up with a vet on the team it was easier to disseminate information to them. Not all vets participated. We're not all warm and fuzzy. But you could see a distinct improvement between vet-newbie relations.)
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
The psychology of losing, or You're down but not out
Losing isn't a goal that we all set out to accomplish. It's hardwired into our nature to win -- survival, last person standing, kill or be killed.
But the laws of nature, even though they govern a large part of our psychological and physiological makeup, aren't the "be all, end all" on the roller derby track.
We all want to win. But in any given sport, there can only be one winner.
That "Highlander"-like thought process has to stand at the forefront when you play any game.
Whether you were beat by 1 point or 200 points, it's important to congratulate the other person/team with sincerity and professionalism, as you would expect the same from your opponent.
I hate excuses. I hate them on the track, and I hate them after the game.
If a player is making excuses on the track or bench, it creates negative energy, and negative energy -- just as positive energy is -- is infectious. One player behaving poorly will spoil the whole bench if someone doesn't control the situation efficiently and quickly. Let the negative energy go and it will consume you're whole team. It's much easier to control one bad attitude than 14 bad attitudes.
"Nip it in the bud," as Barney Fife would say.
The problem with negative attitudes is that they're incredibly easy to give into. Staying positive takes work and when an opponent is constantly taking swings at your players it's harder to manage. The negative energy also casts a dense fog over the entire game, making it incredibly difficult to focus on the game at hand, which is what you and your players should be focusing on.
I've instituted a "quiet bench" philosophy, in which in our lineup the only five players "up to bat" -- or set to go into the next jam -- are the players who are talking are talking to each other. No one else should be chit-chatting, complaining or making any other verbal comment. None. They should be focusing on the game at hand. The five players "up to bat" should be communicating with each other on how they should play their position and what they need to do to improve the team's in-game standing.
A quiet bench goes above and beyond great measure to controlling bad attitudes. A player who willingly violates the "quiet bench" philosophy is in danger of voluntarily giving up her spot on the roster. No exceptions. Does it suck to lose a player willingly? Yes, but if you allow them to stay bench side you are essentially condoning their behavior. You will have to manage the attitudes of your bench less and focus on the game more.
The quiet bench extends all the way through game time, up until the end of the last jam. This becomes very difficult if it's a close game, but important if you are to set an example.
We were at a game in which we were already winning and the announcers encouraged everyone to stand up and get loud for the last jam of the game. As my girls started standing and cheering I asked them to sit down and be quiet. "But they told us to stand up?" one of my players said/asked. "Who's your coach and what does your coach want you to do?" I replied. They politely took their seat and waited anxiously for the end of the jam. Was it a cold response? Yes, but necessary. The quiet bench should be an institution from the time the game starts until it officially ends, win or lose.
(If you are a coach who does not wear the A for the designated captain of your team, seat your captains as close to you as physically possible so that you can talk to them without having to yell across the bench. Yelling even if it's important isn't the best way to communicate as people's personal defenses immediately go up. Plus, you don't want to give away too much information to the other team. Bring your captains closer to you, and use your inside voice.)
After a jam, the heat can come pouring in -- as players complain about calls or a missed hit, etc. Control the issues at hand as quickly as possible and move on. If a player has to vent, let her vent, give her verbal and visual confirmation that you understand and move on. Sometimes all a person needs is an outlet to vent, otherwise it gets bottled up. But you can't get carried away and listen to five girls coming off the track all wanting to vent or you will never be able to focus on the next jam, so make it an exception for only a short few.
After the game is over, it's easy to start making excuses for a loss. Instead of negative reinforcement I try to cultivate positive, critical thinking. Instead of the things we did wrong, or what the other team did illegally, or missed calls -- I try to focus on the things we need to work on, how we can improve and what we can do to control future outcomes a little better.
It's incredibly hard to play a game when there are various events in which you have no control, i.e. bad calls, missed calls, what the other team does. As a coach/captain/player you have to focus on the things you can control and minimize the things you can't control. Things you can control in a game: Game clock (via timeouts, official reviews, injury stoppage), Intentional fourth minors (so you don't inadvertently jam a player with three minors), getting the right pack lineup at the right time, etc.
(As a rule I try not to use our official review on made calls or missed calls. A made call will stand nine times out of tend. A referee makes a call based on what he or she sees and it's pretty hard to argue the logic. Besides the referee may have seen something you didn't -- and you've successfully wasted a review. Likewise a missed call is hard to argue for because if three referees are watching the play and they all miss a call -- you aren't going to get the call made after the fact. Only ask for a official review on a made or missed call if you are absolutely, positively you can get the outcome changed and it drastically affects the game.)
There are plenty of things that one can control in a derby game, and maybe one day I'll actually make a list. But it's important to factor in as much as you do have control over, so that you get most advantages when playing a derby bout.
Are you a player that gets called on elbows a lot? There's not much you can do during a game, but at practice you can certainly work on giving hits without following through with the elbow. After a game, you can certainly ask a ref who called you on an elbow what he/she saw. Don't argue. Zebras often are the best source of information when it comes to changing our mental and physical gameplan for future games. They will usually tell you that you "followed through" or that you "swung your elbow" warranting the call.
As a coach, I try to take notes if I see something happen that I know we can fix. In the first intermission this can be crucial. Jot down two or three things at the most -- more than that and you will confuse everyone. I will usually give my few pieces of advice and then let every player know where they stand with minors and majors. And then we set up the first line for the second half.
(I try to take notes for the second half to address at the next practice if possible, but if the game is incredibly tight, it can be more difficult to remember to write things down.)
I'm hoping with a few improvements I can continue to hone how I coach in crucial games. I know that by managing my bench and focusing on the positive, we, as a team, have a better chance to improve on prepare for the next game even if we lost the last game.
But the laws of nature, even though they govern a large part of our psychological and physiological makeup, aren't the "be all, end all" on the roller derby track.
We all want to win. But in any given sport, there can only be one winner.
That "Highlander"-like thought process has to stand at the forefront when you play any game.
Whether you were beat by 1 point or 200 points, it's important to congratulate the other person/team with sincerity and professionalism, as you would expect the same from your opponent.
I hate excuses. I hate them on the track, and I hate them after the game.
If a player is making excuses on the track or bench, it creates negative energy, and negative energy -- just as positive energy is -- is infectious. One player behaving poorly will spoil the whole bench if someone doesn't control the situation efficiently and quickly. Let the negative energy go and it will consume you're whole team. It's much easier to control one bad attitude than 14 bad attitudes.
"Nip it in the bud," as Barney Fife would say.
The problem with negative attitudes is that they're incredibly easy to give into. Staying positive takes work and when an opponent is constantly taking swings at your players it's harder to manage. The negative energy also casts a dense fog over the entire game, making it incredibly difficult to focus on the game at hand, which is what you and your players should be focusing on.
I've instituted a "quiet bench" philosophy, in which in our lineup the only five players "up to bat" -- or set to go into the next jam -- are the players who are talking are talking to each other. No one else should be chit-chatting, complaining or making any other verbal comment. None. They should be focusing on the game at hand. The five players "up to bat" should be communicating with each other on how they should play their position and what they need to do to improve the team's in-game standing.
A quiet bench goes above and beyond great measure to controlling bad attitudes. A player who willingly violates the "quiet bench" philosophy is in danger of voluntarily giving up her spot on the roster. No exceptions. Does it suck to lose a player willingly? Yes, but if you allow them to stay bench side you are essentially condoning their behavior. You will have to manage the attitudes of your bench less and focus on the game more.
The quiet bench extends all the way through game time, up until the end of the last jam. This becomes very difficult if it's a close game, but important if you are to set an example.
We were at a game in which we were already winning and the announcers encouraged everyone to stand up and get loud for the last jam of the game. As my girls started standing and cheering I asked them to sit down and be quiet. "But they told us to stand up?" one of my players said/asked. "Who's your coach and what does your coach want you to do?" I replied. They politely took their seat and waited anxiously for the end of the jam. Was it a cold response? Yes, but necessary. The quiet bench should be an institution from the time the game starts until it officially ends, win or lose.
(If you are a coach who does not wear the A for the designated captain of your team, seat your captains as close to you as physically possible so that you can talk to them without having to yell across the bench. Yelling even if it's important isn't the best way to communicate as people's personal defenses immediately go up. Plus, you don't want to give away too much information to the other team. Bring your captains closer to you, and use your inside voice.)
After a jam, the heat can come pouring in -- as players complain about calls or a missed hit, etc. Control the issues at hand as quickly as possible and move on. If a player has to vent, let her vent, give her verbal and visual confirmation that you understand and move on. Sometimes all a person needs is an outlet to vent, otherwise it gets bottled up. But you can't get carried away and listen to five girls coming off the track all wanting to vent or you will never be able to focus on the next jam, so make it an exception for only a short few.
After the game is over, it's easy to start making excuses for a loss. Instead of negative reinforcement I try to cultivate positive, critical thinking. Instead of the things we did wrong, or what the other team did illegally, or missed calls -- I try to focus on the things we need to work on, how we can improve and what we can do to control future outcomes a little better.
It's incredibly hard to play a game when there are various events in which you have no control, i.e. bad calls, missed calls, what the other team does. As a coach/captain/player you have to focus on the things you can control and minimize the things you can't control. Things you can control in a game: Game clock (via timeouts, official reviews, injury stoppage), Intentional fourth minors (so you don't inadvertently jam a player with three minors), getting the right pack lineup at the right time, etc.
(As a rule I try not to use our official review on made calls or missed calls. A made call will stand nine times out of tend. A referee makes a call based on what he or she sees and it's pretty hard to argue the logic. Besides the referee may have seen something you didn't -- and you've successfully wasted a review. Likewise a missed call is hard to argue for because if three referees are watching the play and they all miss a call -- you aren't going to get the call made after the fact. Only ask for a official review on a made or missed call if you are absolutely, positively you can get the outcome changed and it drastically affects the game.)
There are plenty of things that one can control in a derby game, and maybe one day I'll actually make a list. But it's important to factor in as much as you do have control over, so that you get most advantages when playing a derby bout.
Are you a player that gets called on elbows a lot? There's not much you can do during a game, but at practice you can certainly work on giving hits without following through with the elbow. After a game, you can certainly ask a ref who called you on an elbow what he/she saw. Don't argue. Zebras often are the best source of information when it comes to changing our mental and physical gameplan for future games. They will usually tell you that you "followed through" or that you "swung your elbow" warranting the call.
As a coach, I try to take notes if I see something happen that I know we can fix. In the first intermission this can be crucial. Jot down two or three things at the most -- more than that and you will confuse everyone. I will usually give my few pieces of advice and then let every player know where they stand with minors and majors. And then we set up the first line for the second half.
(I try to take notes for the second half to address at the next practice if possible, but if the game is incredibly tight, it can be more difficult to remember to write things down.)
I'm hoping with a few improvements I can continue to hone how I coach in crucial games. I know that by managing my bench and focusing on the positive, we, as a team, have a better chance to improve on prepare for the next game even if we lost the last game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)